I think that you may be mistaking complexity with lack of clarity regarding
the questions/tests of which you speak. I have sat for both Cisco and
Microsoft exams and have found that most of the time Microsoft appears to be
more difficult when in actuallity they are not more difficult; only poorly
written.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Navin Parwal
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 8:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: new Microsoft exams tougher than Cisco's
I would agree with you Mihai , I had taken the same test as well 2 days
ago ,, it was definitely one of the toughest test I have ever taken of
Microsoft .
I could not complete my full test in the given time .
Navin Parwal
"Mihai Dumitru" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
>
>
> Hi, group!
>
>
> I took 71-244 (Supporting and Mainaining a Windows NT 4.0 Network beta)
> today. 110 scenario-like questions in 4 hours and I think it was harder
> than any Cisco CCNP exam that I passed till now.
>
> It's not that the Microsoft stuff is too "difficult" to understand, it's
> just about the complexity of the questions. I have never understood why
> Cisco doesn't have more complex questions (scenarios I mean) in its
> exams. DCN is an exception, but compared with what I saw today, a Cisco
> exam is quite easy to pass.
>
>
> Mihai
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
