Sean,

Have you tried using a different rev of code?  I use 12.1.5.T5 on a 
3620 in my home lab and SSH is just as fast as telnet.  This 
sounds like some sort of strange code bug.  

Just a thought,
Kent

On 6 Apr 2001, at 9:09, Sean Young wrote:

> Someone here must have an answer for this one.  Cisco TAC has been
> absolutely NO HELP.  I am sure that 600+ heads in this group,
> together, can help me with this problem.  I have to implement this
> thing tomorrow evening.  I am sure that I will get lot of calls from
> unhappy customers about the latency issue.
> 
> PLEASE HELP.
> 
> 
> >From: "Sean Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: "Sean Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Implement Secure Shell (SSH) on Cisco 3640 router
> >Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2001 21:41:29 -0400
> >
> >Hi everyone,
> >
> >I've posted this question last week but never got a satisfactory
> >response so I will post it again; hopefully, I can get a better
> >suggestion this time.
> >
> >I am running SSH on a Cisco 3640 router with IOS 12.1.7(T) version.
> >This router is used a an access server to control other Cisco
> >devices. Everything is working except it is painfully slow.  At
> >first, I thought it might network latency, so I take the router back
> >to the lab, connect the access server FE interface with a cross-over
> >cable to my laptop and establish a SSH connection to the access
> >server.  The connection is still VERY SLOW.  If I take off SSH and
> >use telnet, it is very fast.  However, disabling SSH is NOT an option
> >for me because this router will be accessable via the Internet and
> >the customer does not want to use TELNET (username and password in
> >clear text).  They don't want any other option, just SSH.  Oh, the
> >router has 32MB Flash and 128MB RAM which I think is plentiful.  Its
> >only purpose is to function as an access-server, nothing else.  I
> >still can not, for the life of me, figure out why SSH creates such a
> >latency.  I did both "show memory" and "show process". In both cases,
> >SSH doesn't take much memory and cpu resources.  I give the "show
> >tech" to Cisco TAC and he has not found a solution for it.  As far as
> >the SSH client is concern, I use either PUTTY or MINDTERM which is
> >extremely slick and fast clients.  They both work great when I SSH
> >into Unix boxes.
> >
> >Any suggestions or ideas for my dilema.
> >Thanks.
> >
> >Sean
> >_________________________________________________________________ Get
> >your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
> _________________________________________________________________ Get
> your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
> Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to