On Mon, 9 Apr 2001, J Roysdon wrote:
> Would an ACL blocking 224.0.0.0 be appropriate? Is there a better way?
Goodbye, OSPF. Goodbye, EIGRP. Goodbye, Mrs Calabash, wherever you are.
Even assuming a more selective ACL, I'm not sure where it would go, as
putting it on the 2948 (which I suppose is a 2948L3) may cause the very
problem it's trying to avoid (I missed part of the thread so I don't
know whether the original poster explained what he means by "a little
grief").
> ""Tony van Ree"" wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have been presented a problem I'm not sure of the answer.
> >
> > I have a CAT5000 switch connecting several VLAN's and a Cisco2948
> providing routing/switching. One of the VLAN's has a process that uses a
> multicasts. These multicasts cause the Cisco2948 a little grief. I do not
> want the Cisco2980 to see the multicast traffic.
> >
> > Any clues would be appreciated.
--
"Someone approached me and asked me to teach a javascript course. I was
about to decline, saying that my complete ignorance of the subject made
me unsuitable, then I thought again, that maybe it doesn't, as driving
people away from it is a desirable outcome." --Me
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=24&t=15
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
