I meant to say "lady", but you know, I'm only 25, so when I speak to
a woman that sounds younger than me I slip up and use "girl". She
couldn't have been older than 22, plus she had a very pleasant
voice... It's not like if I'm a 40 year old engineer defaming
women...
I hope I did not inadvertantly insult any of the wonderful people who
post here and supplement my knowledge. . .
...especially you, your book's "required reading" for anyone that
wants to know the questions one has to ponder in designing an
enterprise network...
F.G.J. Ruiz-Alaniz
On 11 Apr 2001 16:41:33 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Priscilla
Oppenheimer") wrote:
>At 10:35 AM 4/11/01, F.G.J. Ruiz-Alaniz wrote:
>>I called them right around 8 EST time and got an ambiguous response
>>from them. I've learned from experience that beta exams appear in
>>Prometric's systems as "failed" until they get the records uploaded
>>from the company who the test is for. The girl I spoke to stated
>
>Do you really think she was a girl? I doubt that they break the child-labor
>laws, despite other problems they may have.
>
>>such, mumbling to herself, "well it still shows up as failed, wait
>>until the score report gets sent to you or it appears on their
>>tracking system". 2 out of the 3 first beta exams I ever did caused
>>me grief this way until I was mailed the score report that said I
>>passed.
>>
>>I stand a fair chance of failing CID since I got blown away by the new
>>objectives.
>>
>>One should call and see what's up, if one of you guys get a pass from
>>Prometric North America, we know Prometric at least has the scores,
>>though galton doesn't. 1-800-204-EXAM.
>>
>>
>>On 11 Apr 2001 07:07:02 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Fomes Iain")
>>wrote:
>>
>> >Did someone say they had their results ?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >*****************************************************************
>> >DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be
confidential
>> >and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access,
>copying
>> >or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other
>> >person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please
>> >notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator.
>> >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
>>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>> >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
>>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>________________________
>
>Priscilla Oppenheimer
>http://www.priscilla.com
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=266&t=206
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]