Good response... but I personally would grovel a little more :-)
""F.G.J. Ruiz-Alaniz"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I meant to say "lady", but you know, I'm only 25, so when I speak to
> a woman that sounds younger than me I slip up and use "girl". She
> couldn't have been older than 22, plus she had a very pleasant
> voice... It's not like if I'm a 40 year old engineer defaming
> women...
>
> I hope I did not inadvertantly insult any of the wonderful people who
> post here and supplement my knowledge. . .
>
> ...especially you, your book's "required reading" for anyone that
> wants to know the questions one has to ponder in designing an
> enterprise network...
>
> F.G.J. Ruiz-Alaniz
>
>
>
> On 11 Apr 2001 16:41:33 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Priscilla
> Oppenheimer") wrote:
>
> >At 10:35 AM 4/11/01, F.G.J. Ruiz-Alaniz wrote:
> >>I called them right around 8 EST time and got an ambiguous response
> >>from them. I've learned from experience that beta exams appear in
> >>Prometric's systems as "failed" until they get the records uploaded
> >>from the company who the test is for. The girl I spoke to stated
> >
> >Do you really think she was a girl? I doubt that they break the
child-labor
> >laws, despite other problems they may have.
> >
> >>such, mumbling to herself, "well it still shows up as failed, wait
> >>until the score report gets sent to you or it appears on their
> >>tracking system". 2 out of the 3 first beta exams I ever did caused
> >>me grief this way until I was mailed the score report that said I
> >>passed.
> >>
> >>I stand a fair chance of failing CID since I got blown away by the new
> >>objectives.
> >>
> >>One should call and see what's up, if one of you guys get a pass from
> >>Prometric North America, we know Prometric at least has the scores,
> >>though galton doesn't. 1-800-204-EXAM.
> >>
> >>
> >>On 11 Apr 2001 07:07:02 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Fomes Iain")
> >>wrote:
> >>
> >> >Did someone say they had their results ?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >*****************************************************************
> >> >DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be
> confidential
> >> >and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access,
> >copying
> >> >or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any
other
> >> >person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient
please
> >> >notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator.
> >> >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> >>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> >> >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> >>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> >>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >________________________
> >
> >Priscilla Oppenheimer
> >http://www.priscilla.com
> >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=279&t=206
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
