OOOPS! The devil, indeed, is IP.
>On Wed, 11 Apr 2001, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
>
>> >At 12:28 AM 4/11/01, Chuck Larrieu wrote:
>> >>So IS-IS does NOT comply with the OSI model? ;->
>> >>
>> >>Seriously, Howard, when you say that IS-IS operates at the MAC layer,
>> >
>> >He certainly didn't say that! ;-) He said "ISIS runs directly over the
data
>> >link layer." Since I learned protocols the Sniffer way, I understood
this
>> >to mean that ISIS packets are encapsulated in 802.3 frames. There is
not IP
>> >layer.
>> >
>> >Priscilla
>>
>> None of the above.
>>
>> IS-IS
>> 802.2
>> MAC layer
>>
>> as opposed to
>>
>> RIP BGP OSPF (E)IGRP
>> UDP TCP (none) (none)
>> ------------------802.2---------------
>> MAC layer
>
>
>Drawn that way, there's little difference between OSPF, EIGRP, and ISIS.
>But I suspect that you meant:
>
> RIP BGP OSPF (E)IGRP
> UDP TCP (none) (none)
> -------------------IP-----------------
> 802.2
> MAC layer
>
>
>--
>"Someone approached me and asked me to teach a javascript course. I was
>about to decline, saying that my complete ignorance of the subject made
>me unsuitable, then I thought again, that maybe it doesn't, as driving
>people away from it is a desirable outcome." --Me
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=273&t=132
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
