Do I even dare ask why you are allowed to use two regular cables but not
a back to back cable?
Hmm... while writing that I just thought of one good reason. Whenever
I order a back-to-back cable I usually get an RS-232 cable. This would
tend to limit the clock rate between the two routers. If I needed a
higher speed I'd have to find a V.35 back to back cable which seem to be
harder to find.
If you want V.35:
CAB-V35MT=
CAB-V35FC=
If you want RS-232:
CAB-232MT=
CAB-232FC=
HTH,
John
>>> "Ray Mosely" 4/13/01 4:29:14 PM >>>
I'm sorry to bring up this old old old
thread, but I'm in a situation where I
need a back to back cable for some 2501's,
but I'm not allowed to use a back to back
cable.
There are two bona fide Cisco cables which
can be hooked together to make one back
to back cable (at three times the price
of a back to back). Anybody know the
part numbers of the Cisco cables? It's
for back to back on the WAN ports.
Thanks,
Ray Mosely
CCNA, MCSE
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=531&t=527
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
