>Didn't find Appendix A anywhere in that document. Please advise.
Ooops...it got left out again. I promise to fix it in the new BMWG
versions coming out in a couple of weeks.
Appendix A. Representative Scenarios
A.1 Default-free interprovider peering
The DUT exchanges 0.3 to 0.5 D with a small number of peers.
Typically, routers in this application are limited by bandwidth
rather than route processing
A.2 Interprovider peering with transit
The DUT exchanges 1.3 D routes with a small number of peers.
A.2 Provider POP router
The DUT has a large number (>10) of eBGP peers.
To 10% of the peers, the DUT advertises 1.3 D.
To 20% of the peers, the DUT advertises 0.3 D.
To 70% of the peers, the DUT advertises default.
50% of the peers advertise an aggregate and a more-specific route to the DUT.
20% of the peers advertise 10 or more routes to the DUT.
30% of the peers advertise a single route to the DUT/
A.3 Multihomed customer router
The DUT connects to 2 peers. It advertises an aggregate and a
more-specific to each.
>
>"Howard C. Berkowitz" wrote:
>
>
>
>> ...routers are the same. A customer site multihoming router, a POP
>> aggregation router, a POP edge router to the intraprovider core, an
>> intraprovider core router, and an interprovider border router all
>> have different needs. See appendix A of
> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-berkowitz-bgpcon-01.txt.
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2118&t=1479
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
