haha...got filtered for s exu al content ;) Not sure where...
----- Original Message -----
From: "Allen May"
To:
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 10:16 AM
Subject: Re: PIX Question [7:2061]
> 525 has a 600MHz processor and yes...520 is going away soon.
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/cc/pd/fw/sqfw500/prodlit/1302_pp.htm
> The 525 is very fast but very pricey too.
>
> 515 has 200MHz processor. Although it is slower, personally I think it'll
> work for networks as long as you don't get too many people on it. I would
> keep the encryption level down lower than 1024 for sure tho ;)
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/fw/sqfw500/prodlit/pix_pa.htm
> One neat thing they just added to the 515R (restricted) is that you can
> purchase a software license that allows for a 3rd interface with or
without
> failover. The 515R with the additional license and extra NIC is
> significantly cheaper than buying a 515U (unrestricted).
>
> Hope that helps in your decision. It comes down to price vs kick-but*
speed
> ;)
>
> Allen May
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ian Stong"
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 9:16 AM
> Subject: Re: PIX Question [7:2061]
>
>
> > The 520 has a faster cpu for one thing. (515 is a 200mhz while 520 is a
> 300
> > or 333 mhz cpu). Also I believe you get more slots to put interfaces in
> > with the 520.
> >
> > But I wouldn't buy either one - buy a 525. The 515 is too slow if you
are
> > going to do any IPSEC/VPN stuff - even for a small 20 user office. As
> for
> > the 520 since it's end of life soon and since it only has a 300+ mhz
cpu -
> > I'd go with something that would last for a few years - a 525 with 600+
> mhz
> > cpu, etc......
> >
> > Ian
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "simonis"
> > To:
> > Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 9:11 AM
> > Subject: Re: PIX Question [7:2061]
> >
> >
> > > Sammi wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > While the 520 chassis is significantly larger than the 515, I cannot
> > > > discern added hardware or functionality that accounts for the
> > > > differences.
> > >
> > > Probably the same reason that the NetRanger is shipped in a
> > > 4U case. Legacy from the Wheel Group. Small company, 4U cases
> > > are alot cheaper than 2U or 1U cases, and easier to construct.
> > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2121&t=2061
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
