Yes, we are going from one topology to another. This is from TR to Ethernet.
From: "Chris Cell"
Reply-To: "Chris Cell"
To:
Subject: RE: [sc] DLSW+ Problem
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 16:49:36 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from [24.0.95.141] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id
MHotMailBCB71C01004D400438CE18005F8DC6C80; Mon Apr 30 13:54:25 2001
Received: from CC55451A ([24.180.204.240]) by femail14.sdc1.sfba.home.com
(InterMail vM.4.01.03.20 201-229-121-120-20010223) with SMTP
id
for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2001 13:54:11 -0700
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 30 13:55:54 2001
Message-ID:
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
I've seen mtu size cause app problems like that. Are you going from one
topology to another on the local area sides (enet to tr for example)? If so,
then I would look at it from that angle.
Chris
I am not having problem with DLSW+ connectivity. THe peers are up but I am
seeing session drops from application perspective. On the routers I don't
see sny connectivity problem or problems with DLSW+.
>From application point-of-view my user sees SNA communication and SNA SYSTEM
RESOURCE FAILURE messages.
Thanks..
Fawad
From: "Qurashi, Iftikhar"
To: "'Fawad Alam'"
Subject: RE: [sc] DLSW+ Problem
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 16:14:37 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from [159.231.69.23] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id
MHotMailBCB7120E00784004314F9FE745179B760; Mon Apr 30 13:11:58 2001
Received: from cbmrd-xscc001im.scc.intria.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])by
unixs09.scc.intria.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f3UKCJS22386for
; Mon, 30 Apr 2001 16:12:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by CBMRD-XSCC001IM with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)id
; Mon, 30 Apr 2001 16:10:08 -0400
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 30 13:13:36 2001
Message-ID:
Return-Receipt-To: "Qurashi, Iftikhar"
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Dear Fawad,
I am also working on exactly same scenario where I have 2621 on one end and
2612 on other end. let me know more about your scenario and may be I can
help you somehow in this regard
Iftikhar.
-----Original Message-----
From: Fawad Alam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 2:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [sc] DLSW+ Problem
Hi
I am having some performance problem with DLSW+. The peers are 2621 with
IOS Version 12.0(3)T3 and at the other end I have Cisco 2612 with version
11.3(9)T.
Our testing setup with obviously less load worked fine but when we moved to
production the sessions started dropping. I have checked circuit load and it
looks fine. Probably some DLSW+ parametes with some timing features or
problem with IOS is causing this problem. Or may be its related to 2600
routers.
Is there anyone who experienced same kinda issues in past. Any comments.
Thanks...
Peter
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
--
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe cisco-cert | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
--
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe cisco-cert | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2627&t=2627
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
