Intel and Adaptec both make them EtherChannel multi-port NICs.  I'm sure
3Com has or will have Dot1q NICs soon as well.  Search the archives, I
believe I even posted list prices for them a few months back.

--
Jason Roysdon, CCNP+Security/CCDP, MCSE, CNA, Network+, A+
List email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://jason.artoo.net/



""andyh""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> does anyone actually have any experience of "clever" NICs? - ie
> etherchannel-enabled, vlan-aware(ISL/dot1q), etc?
>
> I seem to remember posting this a year or so back with a deafening silence
> as result - have we all really gotten shot of server admin already?  If
so,
> do the server guys know what cool stuff we can do for them??
>
> if anyone has any experience then I would be glad to know about it - NT,
> Solaris, *BSD, etc.
>
> Andy
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Sammi"
> To:
> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 11:15 PM
> Subject: Re: VLAN's and Routers [7:2534]
>
>
> > On 30 Apr 2001 15:06:15 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Howard C. Berkowitz")
> > wrote:
> >
> > >>Thanks all, that clarifies somewhat.
> > >>
> > >>On 30 Apr 2001 14:06:09 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Karen E Young")
> > >>wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>  Usually there needs to be some form of communication
> > >>>between VLANS though, so practically speaking you do need a router.
> > >>
> > >>What I would like to do is create broadcast domains for different
> > >>departments, ie finance, admin. But all departments would need to
> > >>communicate with the same server(s).
> > >
> > >Have you looked at VLAN-aware NICs on the server?  They would let you
> > >have a logical interface in each VLAN.
> >
> > I haven't, but I will do so.
> >
> > >There may be more basic questions.  Approximately how many hosts are
> > >in each department?  What protocols do they run?  Is there a specific
> > >reason you think you may have a problem with broadcasts?  Are the
> > >hosts plugged into switches that can do per-port  broadcast rate
> > >limiting?
> >
> > From my limited knowledge I've observed that there is no network
> > management. All switches are run "out of the box". It seems we would
> > get more efficiency by isolating departments. There are 6 - 12 hosts
> > in a typical department, most located in a one floor building with
> > four wings, others located in various quonset huts connected to main
> > via fibre.
> > Currently running Banyan IP, am migrating the environment to 2000 and
> > rebuilding the infrastructure in the process.
> > I am replacing the 2800 and 1900 switches with Catalyst 2900xl, I
> > haven't seen mention of throttling capability.
> >
> > My goal is to simplify management, or centralize may be more accurate,
> > and make the network as efficient as possible.
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2843&t=2534
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to