Interesting read. Thanks.

Goes to show - Cisco excels in service and support.  I used to think the
licensing procedure for Ciscoworks and Baseliner was a pain. Wow, what a
breeze compared to Checkpoint!

Another interesting comment - the PIX 506 licensing. Cisco has taken to
being very opaque about what a PIX 506 can and should do. Last time I
checked, Cisco's party line was that the 506 is good for "up to 10 internet
connections" and the folks at the pre-sales help line I spoke to were unable
to clarify this statement. Interesting, since I had recalled from
documentation that has long since been deleted from CCO, that the 506 was
good for several thousand simultaneous TCP connections, which is plenty for
any business of a couple hundred users. I suspect Cisco kinda shot
themselves in the foot with the 506, in that it is undercutting sales of
515's to small enterprises.

Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dave
Chappell
Sent:   Friday, May 04, 2001 3:14 PM
To:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:        RE: Cisco PIX vs Checkpoint FIrewall-1 [7:2878]

This might be of interest:

http://www.roble.com/docs/fw1_or_pix.html

Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 10:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cisco PIX vs Checkpoint FIrewall-1 [7:2878]


In a serious enterprise of scale, I would indeed consider using both a pix
and a server based firewall.

            Bri

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Brown"
To:
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 7:44 AM
Subject: RE: Cisco PIX vs Checkpoint FIrewall-1 [7:2878]


> Security holes in lower layers? Where did you come up with that, your
Cisco
> rep?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eugene Nine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 5:01 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Cisco PIX vs Checkpoint FIrewall-1 [7:2878]
>
>
> PIX goes up to layer 4, so it won't do things like URL filtering.
> Checkpoint (or other SW) can do higher layer protection but may not be as
> well at the lower layers (due to security holes in the OS, etc)
> Eugene
>
> ""Chuck Larrieu""  wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Asked sincerely, what advantages do you see in provisions PIX plus
> > checkpoint?
> >
> > Chuck
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 2:47 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Cisco PIX vs Checkpoint FIrewall-1 [7:2878]
> >
> > It depends on your security policy , design and needs  , generally what
we
> > advice our
> > customers is checkpoint + pix together
> >
> > Hatim badr a icrit :
> >
> > > Hi ,
> > >
> > > I would like to know the pluses and minuses of each product .
Currently
> > We
> > > are using checkpoint and I want to convince my management to switch to
> > cisco
> > > PIX firewall .
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Hatim
> > >
> > > ____________________________________________________________________
> > > Get free email and a permanent address at
http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1
> > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3252&t=2878
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to