Eric Rivard wrote: > > If Cisco recommends and companies > like Microsoft and Excite are implementing it, I don't see how it can be > a security risk. It can be, and it is. But, so is just about everything. It is the probability of the risk being exploited that really matters, and in this case I see that as a small one. Now, lets talk about using Microsoft as a security benchmark... ;-) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3706&t=3666 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- security opinions please [7:3666] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: security opinions please [7:3666] Carroll Kong
- Re: security opinions please [7:3666] Sam
- RE: security opinions please [7:3666] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- RE: security opinions please [7:3666] Michael Cohen
- RE: security opinions please [7:3666] Jacques Atlas
- FW: security opinions please [7:3666] Eric Rivard
- Re: security opinions please [7:3666] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: FW: security opinions please [7:3666] Brian
- Re: security opinions please [7:3666] Drew Simonis
- Re: security opinions please [7:3666] Drew Simonis
- Re: FW: security opinions please [7:3666] Jim Gillen
- FW: FW: security opinions please [7:3666] Eric Rivard
- RE: security opinions please [7:3666] Carroll Kong
- Re: FW: FW: security opinions please [7:3666] Jim Gillen
- Re: security opinions please [7:3666] andyh
- Re: FW: security opinions please [7:3666] Bradley J. Wilson
- Re: security opinions please [7:3666] Jacques Atlas
- Re: security opinions please [7:3666] Robert Nelson-Cox
- Re: security opinions please [7:3666] Jacques Atlas

