ok, typically when trying to get a positive indication, either good or bad -
from Cisco about capabilities - is a very difficult thing.
We have had good long threads on the list about things that work vs. things
that are supported.
That being said, here is a snippet from:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/cc/pd/rt/3600/prodlit/atmnm_ov.htm
Which describes an ATM module for the 3600 series.
Technical Specifications
ATM OC-3 Network Module System Requirements
Only supported on the Cisco 3600 series routers at this time
Not supported on the Cisco 2600 series
No slot placement restrictions on either platform
***** Maximum recommended on a single Cisco 3640 and Cisco 3620 is one
***** Max two high-speed network modules in a Cisco 3640 (includes Fast
Ethernet, ATM, HSSI)
Requires Plus feature sets of Cisco IOS Release 12.0(3)T or above
Operates in conjunction with all currently available Cisco 3600 network
modules and WAN interface cards (WICs)
**************
Note my stars. Although it says 2 modules I think this was before the 2FE2W
was around......
Now, below is a table from:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/cc/pd/rt/3600/prodlit/1fefx_ov.htm
Which is for the 1FEFX
Supported Configurations
The following table provides configurations supported by the new modules.
Table 2: Module Maximum Quantity in Cisco Max Number of NM-1FE-FX 3620
3640
NM-1FE-FX 1 3
*********
bad pasting but it reads 1 FEFX for a 3620 and 3 for a 3640.
Now having said all that, this page says that YES you can put 2 x NM-2FE2W
in a 3620:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/rt/2600/prodlit/2636m_ds.htm
The Maximum Number of NMs that can be utilized in each of the 2600/3600
families is as follows:
NM-2FE2W N/A
2600 3620 3640 3660
N/A 2 4 6
Also: The minimum level of IOS is IOS 12.0(7)XK or 12.1(1)T
And finally.........
You may want to look and see if you have a 3620 that has PCI bus problems.
In this case (I actually had one and returned it), it was specifically ATM
but your output did mention PCI dev 5
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/770/51.shtml
give the command: show pci hardware
and if you see 0x22 or 0xE2 - then your 3620 should be returned.
In any event, I think you have a case to take to TAC.
Kevin Wigle
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gareth Hinton"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, 08 May, 2001 19:56
Subject: Re: 3620 with 2 x NM-2FE-2W problem [7:3687]
> That's exactly the sort of thing I'm looking for, but I've scoured CCO and
> cannot find anything that says it will or won't work.
>
> I've heard rumour that the only limiting factor was that I would not get a
> non-blocking configuration, but I'll put up with that if I can get it to
> work.
>
> Anybody any clues, particularly on the error that points to ROM version,
> while ROM version seems to be sufficient?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gaz
>
> ""Kevin Wigle"" wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > I would have to find it again but I'm sure that somewhere on CCO it says
> > that a 3620 shouldn't have more than 2 fast interfaces be they fast
> ethernet
> > or ATM or a combination.
> >
> > Your router now has 4 fast interfaces.
> >
> > Kevin Wigle
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Gareth Hinton"
> > To:
> > Sent: Tuesday, 08 May, 2001 17:39
> > Subject: 3620 with 2 x NM-2FE-2W problem [7:3687]
> >
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Problem with a 3620:
> > >
> > > Takes one NM-2FE-2W fine. When second one is inserted major problems
> > arise.
> > >
> > > NM slot 0: PCI dev 5 init failed
> > > No fault history 0xFFFFFFFF. Need 11.1 (2) or higher ROM
> > >
> > > The boot rom is "System Bootstrap, Version 11.1(20)AA2"
> > >
> > > I've gone through CCO to confirm that the 3620 will take these cards,
> and
> > > although there were a few doubts, eventually found it and they should
be
> > OK.
> > >
> > > Anybody seen similar or got ideas.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Gaz
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3723&t=3687
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
