I would say use dot1q everywhere.
ISL will disappear at some point in the future. Big overheads compared to
dot1q.
Anybody have any valid reasons to stay with ISL?
Gaz
""carmelo Garofalo"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi Guys,
> i have a question for you.
>
> In my site i have to project a new network architecture.
>
> I would organize the Resource human in V-LAN. Of course all V-LAN have to
> access some services (example DNS, E-Mail, Domain Controller etc. etc) and
> not others.
>
> The NIC interfaces of my servers permit the 802.1Q encapsulation.
>
> I would make the TRUNK between switches (Catalyst 4000 - access Layer and
> Catalyst 6500 -Core Layer) with ISL trunk.
>
> Can i map the 802.1Q trunk on ISL trunk? And how could i do this ?
>
> Please indicate me link where i can find a example of this configuration ?
>
> Regards, Carmelo
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3893&t=3798
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
