The First two routes would load balance on a per destination basis if you
have ip route-cache enabled. With Ip route-cache disabled, it would load
balance on a per-packet basis resulting in hisgh cpu utilization. The last
statement is invalid and was kicked back when I tried to test it with the
message:>Host part of desstination is non-zero.
Ejay Hire
-----Original Message-----
From: beth shriver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 5:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: static ip routes and how they work? [7:4077]
Hello, I have a quick question about ip routes and how
they work , if i have the following:
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 155.1.8.222
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 150.5.11.11
ip route 204.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 150.3.53.3
and then tryp to ping 204.167.*.* what route would
this take and why? the reason i ask is in some of my
routes i have a frame relay with back up isdn and so i
have to have 2 route statements in host router. is
there a rule like ip dial maps where if the first
doesnt work it goes to second? so should i have these
put in a certain order based on which one i want it to
try first?
Thanks for anyone who can clear up my confusion!!!
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=4204&t=4077
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]