Like the other reply sez, a routing table check may be in order, you have
multiple routes out of equal preference?
Brian "Sonic" Whalen
Success = Preparation + Opportunity
On Mon, 21 May 2001, Watson, Rick, CTR, OUSDC wrote:
> All,
>
> When performing a trace on an IP address (for "testing purposes we'll use
> 10.1.2.3) this is the result I get:
>
> router#trace 10.1.2.3
>
> Type escape sequence to abort.
> Tracing the route to 10.1.2.3
>
> 1 192.1.2.2 4 msec
> 192.1.2.10 4 msec
> 192.1.2.2 4 msec
> 2 10.1.2.3 0 msec 4 msec 4 msec
> 3 * * *
> 4 * * *
> 5 * * *
> 6 * * *
>
> This to me shows that I am still trying to find a path to the IP
> address...but if the IP Address is returned at the 2nd hop, why is the
trace
> still continuing? I thought that it would stop when the trace has the
> "path". Also note that when a "ping" is performed it returns the infamous
> "....."
>
> This has really got me perplexed, and any help would be greatly
appreciated.
> Maybe I am just not understanding something about the trace command/ICMP.
>
> Rick Watson
> Network Engineer
> Advanced Systems Development, Inc.
> OUSD(Comptroller)
> 703.697.5710 office
> 800.309.7782 pager ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5276&t=5259
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
