I bought the 5009, because I wasn't sure when I would have the funds for an additional Fast Ethernet blade. Both Engines are pretty much the same. The 5009 has MI (RJ45) or MII ports & the 5006 only has 2 single 100 Base FX. All the best Phil ----- Original Message ----- From: Ed Dombrowski To: Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2001 8:48 AM Subject: Advantages/disadvantages of WS-x5006 module over ws-x5009 [7:6023] > Can anybody offer any insight into the advantages or disadvantages of a > ws-x5006 SUP I module (FX uplinks) compared to a ws-x5009 SUP I module (TX > uplinks) in a typical CCNP/CCIE lab environment where the CAT5K is probably > the only switch or maybe there is one other switch like a 2924 xl. In a > single switch environment it doesnt seem like there would be much difference > and there seems to be many more CAT5k switches with 5006 modules on ebay. > In an environment where you have say a 2924 downstream from the CAT5k > wouldnt you just use a 10/100 link from something like a 5213 card? I know > this is kind of a basic question but i am just looking for some insight on > this issue. > > Ed > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=6038&t=6038 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
