Side issue is that older blades require an expensive SIMM upgrade. Avoid any with Hardware revision 1.6 and lower. Another way to identify these cards are that the part number is 73-1414-08 Rev A0 and below. 73-1414-09 and above are OK. > -----Original Message----- > From: Ed Dombrowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2001 7:49 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Advantages/disadvantages of WS-x5006 module over ws-x5009 > [7:6023] > > > Can anybody offer any insight into the advantages or > disadvantages of a > ws-x5006 SUP I module (FX uplinks) compared to a ws-x5009 SUP > I module (TX > uplinks) in a typical CCNP/CCIE lab environment where the > CAT5K is probably > the only switch or maybe there is one other switch like a > 2924 xl. In a > single switch environment it doesnt seem like there would be > much difference > and there seems to be many more CAT5k switches with 5006 > modules on ebay. > In an environment where you have say a 2924 downstream from the CAT5k > wouldnt you just use a 10/100 link from something like a 5213 > card? I know > this is kind of a basic question but i am just looking for > some insight on > this issue. > > Ed > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct > and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=6040&t=6040 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
