The 2600 series only has one NM slot, but you can buy NM modules with
different numbers of ports on them.
--
Neil Schneider
MCT MCSE CCSI CCNP
""Sean Young"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> CM,
>
> I don't know where you buy the Cisco 2600s router but from what I can see
> in
>
> front of me, I have a Cisco 2610, Cisco 2611 and another 2621, all of
> them only
>
> have 1 Network Module (NM) slot. If you are referring to Cisco 3620 then
> I
>
> might agree with you that Cisco 3620 has 2 NM slots. Please don't give
> out
>
> wrong information unless you know it is accurate.
>
> Anyone else would like to comment on this one. Am I correct in this
> case?
>
> Regards,
>
> Sean
>
> >From: Charles Manafa >To: 'Sean Young ' , "'[EMAIL PROTECTED] '"
> >Subject: RE: Can anyone shed the light on Cisco AUX port? [7:6640]
> >Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 21:27:29 +0100 > >Cisco 2600 is a modular router
> like the 3600, and is capable of supporting >two modules. Whether or not
> these slots are populated, it doesn't change the >tty numbering, i.e slot
> 0: 0-31, slot 1: 32-64 etc. As the AUX port is the >last tty + 1, the AUX
> port is 65 on a 2600. > >CM > >-----Original Message----- >From: Sean
> Young >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: 31/05/01 19:19 >Subject: Can
> anyone shed the light on Cisco AUX port? [7:6640] > >I am hoping someone
> on the group can explain to me the following >situation: I've noticed
> that on the Cisco 2500s platform, the AUX port >is >listed on line 1
> (sine consoleport is on line 0). However, on Cisco >2600s platform, the
> AUX port is listed on line 65(console port is still >at line 0). On the
> cisco 3640 router, if I put my FE module in slot 0, >thenthe AUX port is
> listed on line 129. If I put my FE module in slot >3, >then the AUX port
> is listed on line 97. I understand why that is the >case on Cisco 2500s
> and 3600s platform, but apparently, the 2600s >platform is really out of
> wack. Why doesn't Cisco make themconsistent >on >all platforms? I work
> for an ISP shop and it is hard for me to new >network engineering folks
> about this especially when it involves >async-lines, AS5300, Radius
> andTACACS (you get the point). I guess >when Cisco controls about 90%
> market share of the router market, it >really doesn't give a f___ about
> these things. No wonder why Juniper >andAvici >are kicking Cisco's ass in
> the carrier market because it makes the >product moreuser-friendly (until
> it becomes just as big as Cisco then >those guys will start acting
> arrogant). An explaination from anyone in >this group is very appreciate.
> Sean >
> >------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > >
> misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=6699&t=6640
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
