Take a look at this example. I have successfully tried it out in my lab.

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/793/access_dial/execcall.html



"kevin jones" wrote in message ...
>I need help with this situation.
>
>I connect the cisco 2610 router AUX port to an External US Robotics
>Sporter 33.6kps modem for remote acess in case all else fail.  This
>Cisco router 2610 acts as an access server which I use to control other
>Cisco devices on the network.  I can connect to the
>router via dial-up from my laptop when my DSL connection goes down (I only
>use dial-up as the last resort).  I also TACACS authentication.  Everything
>is working fine so far.  Now I would like to achieve the following:
>
>I would like to implement the call-back capability on the router.  What it
>means is that let say that whenever I make a dial-up attempt to the router
>AUX port, the router will disconnect my connection and dial  back to my
>original number.  For example:
>
>1) Cisco router 2610 is connected to phone number (703) 637-7000,
>2) My laptop is connected to phone number (202) 637-1234,
>
>From my laptop, whenever I dial (703) 637-7000 from the number (202)
>637-1234, the router will hang-up and call-back number (202) 637-1234 and
>only to this number so that someone else, let say from (408) 222-1245 tries
>to make connection to the router, he/she will fail.
>
>This method is similar to Windows RAS with call-back capability.  I've been
>playing with this for the past few days (cisco router that is) without
>success.  Anyone in this group have done this before, I would love to get a
>sample configuration from you, or at least point me to the right direction.
>
>Many thanks.
>
>Kevin
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=6851&t=6834
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to