which services are you looking to redirect, any or just 1??

        Brian

----- Original Message -----
From: "Sim, CT (Chee Tong)" 
To: 
Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2001 11:05 PM
Subject: can we NAT the destination IP using IOS's NAT nature? [7:7032]


> Hi..dear all,
>
> We have a requirment to NAT a destination virtual IP to a different IP
> behind the "Firewall".  I have set up a cisco 2500 "packet filter" with 2
> interfaces ethernet0, 50.100.167.101 and ethernet1 192.168.3.2 and they
are
> in two different networks. There is a SUN host 192.168.3.31 (A) in
> 192.168.3.X network,  We want to contact A in network 192.168.3.X from B
> (50.100.167.199) in network 50.100.167.x via a virtual IP 50.100.167.102
in
> eth0.  What I mean when I connect to 50.100.167.102, I actually connect to
> 192.168.3.31, but people won't know the real IP of that.   Can Cisco IOS
> router do this?  The information I get can only translate the source IP
> address.  How about destination address?  If yes, can you show me how is
the
> command look like?
>
>
> CT
>
> ==================================================================
> De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en
> is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht
> onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en
> de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren.
> ==================================================================
> The information contained in this message may be confidential
> and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you
> receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents
> herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail.
>
>
> ==================================================================




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=7033&t=7033
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to