No for "packet by packet" you get 50-50 do a traceroute out several times
and you will see the switch.
My question is does it really make a difference on low end routers to have
CEF enabled. I have done it both with and without cef with no difference.
-----Original Message-----
From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 11:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: CEF/dCEF [7:7330]
Idle curiousity - are you getting true "packet by packet" load sharing? Or
conversation by conversation?
i.e. is your traffic balance 50-50 ( for two lines )? Or some other figure,
because traffic for particular destinations is dent out particular links due
to the route caching?
Chuck
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Mike
Fountain
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 8:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: CEF/dCEF [7:7330]
We use CEF on some of our 2600s so that we can do Packet-by-Packet
loadbalancing without having to process-switch every packet and burn up the
CPU
----- Original Message -----
From: "West, Karl"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 9:38 AM
Subject: CEF/dCEF [7:7330]
> To all:
>
> I understand the features that CEF/dCEF provide for high end VIP based
> routers. I know the 3600's and 2100's has CEF options in their IOS, what
> would running CEF on these platforms benefit me?
>
> Karl
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=7359&t=7330
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
