An article about GRC.com was also in the SANS newsletter.

Tim LeBrun
CCNA, CCDA


-----Original Message-----
From: Logan, Harold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 2:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: grc.com under a DOS attack [7:7377]


Hrmm... I don't know how much bandwidth the good people at grc have from
their ISP, but considering the number of people that have been referred
to the site from this list, and considering that the site is unavailable
right now, I'd say it looks like Priscilla just engineered a DOS attack
on the poor people at grc.com. Poor guys. Maybe I'll get to read the
article after the entire networking community gets done reading it.

=)

Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 23:55:49 -0400
From: "Jennifer Cribbs" 
Subject: Re: Interesting DOS article [7:7272]

That was a very interesting article.   I knew things like that went on,
but
have never had a person experience of such.
I liked the detail that was gone into about the solution.  I am
forwarding
the link to friends.

Jennifer Cribbs

6/5/2001 9:52:31 PM, "Natasha"  wrote:

>Somewhat a long read but very enlightening.
>The article on Windows XP was just as scary.
>Thank you so much Priscilla, I'm going to pass your find on to some
>other network folks that could use it.
>
>
>>Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>>
>> http://grc.com/dos/grcdos.htm  
>>
>> Priscilla
>>
>> ________________________
>>
>> Priscilla Oppenheimer
>> http://www.priscilla.com  
>--
>Natasha Flazynski
>CCNA, MCSE
> http://www.ciscobot.com  
>My Cisco information site.
> http://www.botbuilders.com  
>Artificial Intelligence and Linux development
>------------------------------------------------
Have a great day!!
Jennifer

[GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had
a name of winmail.dat]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=7393&t=7377
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to