Go to www.cciebootcamp.com . They have pretty good write up. I know of 2
guys that just took it........and I dont know but they both said they were
going to smoke it....yet they both never got invited back on the second day.
Perhaps they undersetimated the amount of material and the little hidden
mines along the way that this exam is famous for. The only thing I disagree
with is the statement that one of the guys made. He did not really care that
he failed but that he had "seen it" and now knew what to do. I think its
this kind of attitude which will cause him more problems. If he tends to
assume that the exam he took is the only blue print he will set himself up
again to fail. Anyway, these guys work with me and said the exam was truly a
monster.
Raul
----- Original Message -----
From: "NetEng Phx"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 1:14 PM
Subject: What is the Lab 'like'? [7:8366]
> All,
>
> I am looking forward to a run at my CCIE next year and I am trying to
> visualize what the Lab test will be 'like'. I have read Cisco's material
> and searched around a bit, but that info falls short of what I am looking
> for here.
>
> I understand the lab consist of essentially two parts; build out and
> troubleshooting. How are the Problems/requirements presented?
>
> For example, are you given very high level requirements such as "build a
> scalable network" and you make all the design decisions, or are you likely
> to get more specific requirements such as; "plan and addressing scheme to
> conserve IP space and router resources", or even more specific like:
> "select and OSPF network type to use in your network"?
>
> In the troubleshooting section, do they insert faults that you have to
> discover, or do they provide you with at least some clue of which high
level
> functionality may or may not be working? Real world troubleshooting is
> usually in response to observed problem, or issue. Is it fair game to
have
> something tweaked in the configs that is not expressed in any level of
> functionality, or lack there-of, on the test pod?
>
> Are the problems presented in writing, orally by the proctor, or both?
>
> Do you deliver to the proctor diagrams, and notes, or just the configs and
> cableing on the routers.
>
> Are you required to orally defend your design?
>
> I am not interested in info that violates the agreement with Cisco, just
any
> input that can help me visualize what it will be like.
>
>
> Thanks!
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8377&t=8366
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
