Cat6509 will allow you to configure SPAN feature even when the two ports 
does not match speed.  It will prevent you to configure the SPAN if the 
source and destination ports are in the same ASIC.

The SPAN configuraion guidelines does not mention that it is not recommended 
tthe both destination and source be in same speed.

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat6000/sw_5_5/cnfg_gd/span.htm#14293


>From: "Patrick Ramsey" 
>Reply-To: "Patrick Ramsey" 
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: span port [7:8310]
>Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 13:31:53 -0400
>
>No you will not catch all the frame if they exceed 10mb.  The cat may not
>even allow it.  I am not sure.  but if the switch does allow it, and the
>data amount exceeds 10mb, then it can not possibly mirror from 100mb to 
>10mb
>which your laptop is set to.
>
>-Patrick
>
> >>> "Bob S"  06/13/01 01:16PM >>>
>Yes, you will be able to mirror the traffic from the source you've 
>specified
>to the destination port.  There aren't any issue that I know of.
>
>
> >From: "Adekola, Dennis D"
> >Reply-To: "Adekola, Dennis D"
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: span port [7:8310]
> >Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 04:14:41 -0400
> >
> >Hi Guys,
> >
> >i have a server running at 100mb
> >and i am trying to mirror the port on a CAT 6509
> >with the set span command.
> >
> >The problem is i have an ethernet card on my laptop which runs at 10mb
> >
> >The question is will i be able to capture the frames adequately with my
> >10mb
> >NIC
> >
> >
> >Thanks for your help
> >
> >Tade (CCNP)
>_________________________________________________________________
>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8383&t=8310
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to