Assuming the NAT is configured correctly, this shouldn't be a problem
either. As a matter of fact, one of the three scenarios the Cisco Press
BCRAN book uses to show when to use NAT, is when the two networks have
overlapping addresses..... like this case.
Mike W.
"Raees Ahmed Shaikh" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Thanks for the reply Micheal what about the second option
>
> Clienta(150.150.1.1)----PIX----INTERNET(Webserver 150.150.1.1)
>
> Sorry the example which I quoted earlier carried a pix on the otherside
> aswell but I mean a host on the internet.
>
> thanks
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael L. Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Fri, June 22, 2001 2:48 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Natting !!! [7:9496]
>
>
> I don't see why not. The address of Client A will get translated to a
> "real" Internet IP (by your NAT at Site A), then the packet will go to
Site
> B, where it will be seen as any other internet addressed packet, and get
> translated by the NAT at Site B. I don't see why there would be any
issue.
>
> Having said that, I know there are some applications (like ICQ) that won't
> let things that require a direct connection to happen (like file
transfers)
> if both parties are behind NATs. (unless there is some fancy port
> forwarding, etc).
>
> My 2 cents.
> Mike W.
>
> "Raees Ahmed Shaikh" wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Hi all,
> >
> >
> > A question about natting/patting.
> >
> > Can two duplicate private ip address communicate with each other over
> the
> > internet. The example below assume there are two sites using the same
> > private address of class b range and they happen to use duplicate ips.
> >
> >
> > Client A
> > Client B
> >
> >
>
172.16.1.1--------------->PIX-------------------Internet-----------------PIX
> -------------------Internet-------------------
> ----------------PIX--------------------150.150.1.1
> >
> > Inthis example clientA is under a private site which is using a public
ip
> > address range of 150.150.1.1, which he had configured by himself, the
> range
> > is not given by an ISP, he is connected to the internet by a firewall
and
> he
> > happens to access a site which has an public registered webserver from
the
> > same range 150.150.1.1, Will he able to connect to that webserver,
> >
> > Please explain if yes/no.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9579&t=9496
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
