Actually, you're correct....... I hadn't thought of that, but yeah, anything
trying to get to 150.150.1.1 will get directed to the internet host, not
your network.
Mike W.
"_" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I think the site with the illegal address scheme will be able to access
the
> internet, but they won't be able to access any of the sites with the same
IP
> addresses. For example if one of your workstations is assigned
> 150.150.1.1/16 and there is a web site with 150.150.1.1/24 and you send a
> ping from a workstation with 150.150.1.2/16, you will get the reply from
the
> other workstation and not the web site. The best thing to do is have the
> customer with the illegal address scheme re-number to a private network
> number, unless they are never going to access the internet sites in the
> 150.150.0.0/16 subnet.
>
> > I don't see why not. The address of Client A will get translated to a
> > "real" Internet IP (by your NAT at Site A), then the packet will go to
> Site
> > B, where it will be seen as any other internet addressed packet, and get
> > translated by the NAT at Site B. I don't see why there would be any
> issue.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9580&t=9496
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
