Thanks, Thats exactly what I was looking for.
""Eric Hoffman"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Here is a link that may answer some questions about HSRP groups, and what
it
> could be used for.
>
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/619/7.html
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Eric Hoffman
> Senior Systems Engineer
> MCP, CCNA, CCNP
> Computer Professionals International
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 4:03 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: HSRP [7:10428]
>
>
> HSRP is for router redundancy, not WAN circuit redundancy. If you wanted
to
> have internet or WAN circuit redundacy, you would of course use two lines,
> have equal-cost routes (two default routes...etc) and that's all that's
> involved. HSRP not needed for WAN load-balancing/redundancy...
>
> Marc
>
>
> "Sam Sneed" wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > I was doing a little research on HSRP and had a question for anyone who
> has
> > configured it. I read the whole RFC 2281 and could not find my answer
> there.
> > If you have two routers running HSRP with T1 lines to the internet, 1 is
> the
> > standby and one is the active. Does all traffic only go through the
active
> > at all times unless it dies? If so isn't it a waste not ever utilizing
the
> > T1 line thats on standby (of course until the active fails)?
> >
> > If bandwidth exceeded 1.5MB would the second router kick in to share the
> > load or would it totally take over?
> >
> > With these 2 routers acting as a single virtual router would throughput
> > ever be able to exceed 1.54 MB assuming each has its own T1 connection?
> >
> > thanks
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=10436&t=10428
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
