Well, the parade is over, and now I'm _really_ tired, but, I got to
wondering again. What problem are you trying to solve? Why doesn't the
EIGRP route go away anyway, even though e1 is still up. The local router
should stop hearing EIGRP hellos from the remote router if the wireless
link between them is down. Convergence might not be fast (three hellos must
fail) but it should still work.
You do have a router at the remote side too, don't you? Is it running EIGRP?
Oh, I get it. The server is not on the other side of the router at the
remote site. It's on a switch on the Ethernet where the bridge is. Can you
move the server to the other side of the router?
Priscilla
At 08:46 PM 7/4/01, KM Reynolds wrote:
>Oh yes, you all have a holiday. Happy 4TH of July (Everyone).
>I shall wait to see if any CCIEs reply. If not I think segmenting the
>wireless bridges is the way to go, I feel bridging is taking a step back.
>
>Thanks
>KM
>
>
>>From: Priscilla Oppenheimer
>>To: "KM Reynolds" ,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: Re: Directly connected ethernet interface [7:10998]
>>Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2001 09:12:25 -0700
>>
>>Sitting here at Starbucks, using wireless, waiting for the 4th of July
>>parade.... My brain isn't working too well. The latte wore off hours ago.
>>
>>But.... it occurs to me that Aironet is bridging, as you know. The routed
>>network doesn't know when a bridged network goes down. Could you do this
>>area of the network with all bridging? Could the ISDN link use bridging
>>also, in other words? I know bridging over ISDN is supported.
>>
>>The convergence might be so slow, however, that you could pull the e1
>>interface in about the same timeframe (if you knew to do it though.)
>>
>>I can't think of any other solution (besides the one you mentioned of
>>adding a router). It's an interesting design question. Maybe one of the
>>CCIEs on the list will answer.
>>
>>Priscilla
>>
>>At 11:35 AM 7/4/01, KM Reynolds wrote:
>>>Hi Everyone,
>>>
>>>Need you help.
>>>
>>>I have a server that is on a remote LAN. To ping the server, the traffic
>>>goes in the local router(gateway) e0, out e1, to a local Aironet wireless
>>>bridge, to the remote Aironet wireless bridge, to a switch, to server.
>>>Works great.
>>>
>>>Currently, there is also a link to the remote site, an ISDN, from the
local
>>>router to a remote router. We would like to use this ISDN as a backup to
>>>wireless connection.
>>>
>>>The routers are configured to use EIGRP to route between the wireless, and
>>>floating routes are set with higher administrative distance so when the
>>>EIGRP disappears out of the routing table the floating routes route via
the
>>>ISDN.
>>>
>>>All works, when the ethernet (e1) is shutdown. When I disconnect the
>>>wireless at the remote, the ISDN comes up. The problem is, the route to
the
>>>directly connected ethernet LAN is still in the routing table (C
>>>192.168.30.128 255.255.255.128 is directly connected, Ethernet1). So
traffic
>>>still flows out of e1, and I guess when it reaches the remote wireless
>>>bridge, it is discarded, that where the connection is down.
>>>
>>>Is there anyway around this, is there a way for the e1 to detect the path
is
>>>down or is my only option to place a router and segment the wireless
bridge
>>>link.
>>>
>>>Any help would be great.
>>>
>>>Thanks
>>>KM
>>>_________________________________________________________________________
>>>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>>________________________
>>
>>Priscilla Oppenheimer
>>http://www.priscilla.com
>
>_________________________________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
________________________
Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11025&t=10998
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
