Put more water in it and drink it slower chaps! After all you would not
want to be mistaken for Klingons would you!
Has the silly season arrived early in the US!
K
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Johnson"
To:
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 5:57 PM
Subject: RE: Failover distance between two PIXes [7:11468]
> What planet are you from!!!!
> PIX flux capacitors have had anti negative-induction protection since 4.47
> (and who can't remember the fabled matter-anti-matter bug of 4.45)...
> Sheesh......
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 9:29 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Failover distance between two PIXes [7:11468]
>
>
> But beware...if you upgrade using a non-Cisco positronic quasitator, you
> run the risk of creating a negative induction through the flux capacitor
> which will result in inverted backpressure toward the source. This has
> the effect of cancelling out the signal or at least reducing it to the
> point where you can never achieve failover.
>
> Besides, it voids your warranty.
>
> regards,
> John (who must not have enough work to do!)
>
> >>> "Peter Slow" 7/9/01 10:09:31 AM >>>
> quite simply, you need to upgrade the positronic quasitator on the
> motherboard of your packet-dropping device. this will allow the
> electron
> flows to migrate from the electro-channeling device over the
> flex-capacitor
> to a lambda on the quanta-channeling circuit.
>
> -Peter Slow
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Patrick Ramsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 11:35 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Failover distance between two PIXes [7:11468]
>
>
> Without the serial cable, there is no way to keep the configs updated
> on
> both machines. The ethernet cables are actualy what control failover.
>
> In theory, you could run ip to and from a termserver on either end and
> connect to a local serial port from that term server to the pix.
>
> IE. PIX1---->serial to TS1------>ethernet----->TS2------->serial to
> pix2
>
> Remember for failover to take place though you still have to have an
> ethernet connection between the two, and for stateful failover it must
> be
> full duplex.
>
> -Patrick
>
> >>> "RB Jsn Eggert Gupmundsson" 07/09/01 11:18AM >>>
> Is there any way to create failover between PIXes over longer distance
> than
> the max limit of the failover cable (modified RS-232). I am thinking
> of
> connecting two houses. The distanse between them is around 2
> kilometers.
> There is an Gb Ethernet optical cable between them that I can use if
> the PIX
> supports it. I have looked on the CCO but have not seen any article
> about
> this.
>
> Regards
> Jon Eggert Gudmundsson
> Network Administrator
> Icelandic Banks Data Center
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11504&t=11468
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
