Cisco's not too clear........ but they make the blanket statement "Cisco
Systems introduced support for RADIUS in Cisco IOS Software Release 11.1"
which implies to me that all versions of IOS after 11.1 should support
RADIUS. But they are probably referring to routers instead of switches.....
who knows... =)
Mike W.
"Karen E Young" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I did some research on this last summer. At that time 2900Xl and 3500XL
> switches did not support RADIUS authentication. (Switch IOS version
> 12.0(5)XP). As it happens, they didn't support Kerberos Telnet either but
> you didn't ask for that.
>
> Here's a quick sampling on what I got:
>
> Cat4000 ver 5.4(3)
> Local (no username)
> TACACS+
> RADIUS
> Kerberos Telnet
>
> Cat2900XL/3500XL ver 12.0(5)XP
> Local (no username)
> Local (username & password)
> TACACS
> TACACS+
> Extended TACACS
>
> 2600/3600 ver 12.0(5)T
> Local (no username)
> Local (username & password)
> TACACS+
> RADIUS
> Kerberos Telnet
>
> HTH,
> Karen
>
> *********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
>
> On 7/10/2001 at 4:35 PM Brian Wilkins wrote:
>
> >I am attempting to use RADIUS for authentication on some Cisco Catalyst
> >3500XL-EN switches. I haven't been very successful in finding any
> >documentation on Cisco's website regarding this. It would seem that
Cisco
> >prefers TACACS. The RADIUS server setup is fine, but I need more info on
> >how to configure the Cat 3500's.
> >
> >If anyone has any suggestions, they would be appreciated.
> >
> >Brian Wilkins
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12337&t=11797
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
