Robert,
Here are some links that can help you out.....
This link compares the Hybrid to the Native IOS
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/si/casi/ca6000/tech/cat65_wp.htm
This link is a page of instructions on how to convert from Hybrid to Native
IOS:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/81.shtml
This link is how to change back from Native to Hybrid (if you need to):
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/80.shtml
Here is the latest version of the Native IOS:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/si/casi/ca6000/prodlit/1412_pp.htm
Hope this helps!
Mike W.
"Lopez, Robert" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Michael,
>
> Could you point me to documentation regarding the "native ios" option you
> used. Thanks!
>
> Robert
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael L. Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 6:49 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: redundant MSFC synchronization problem [7:12360]
>
>
> It's possible to run the MSFCs 2 ways...... in High Avail (under the
Hybrid
> CatOS/IOS) you need to enable the high system availability on the CatOS
side
> then configure the 2 MSFCs with HSRP. Otherwise, you have to make those
> changes to both MSFCs manually (AFAIK).
>
> That's why it's advantageous to use the Native IOS, so that you can
> configure (what appears to be) a single router with a boatload of
> interfaces, and all sync and replication between the active and redundant
> Sup are automatic (by default in Native IOS 12.x and higher). You can run
> the Native (aka Supervisor IOS) for Enhanced High Availability in which
case
> the one of the Sup/MSFC acts as a total physical backup for the other
(i.e.
> it appears as one Sup/MSFC). We just did some testing on our 6509 today
by
> yanking out the active Sup and timing it until the other came up. Took
> about 1 minute before the standby Sup initialized all of the line cards
and
> was up and running completely.... (not bad considering it's just slightly
> longer than an STP recalc).
>
> Fun stuff.
>
> Mike W.
>
> "cisco skin" wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > You need at least 12.1(3a)E4 for high availabilty on the MSFC's.
> >
> >
http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/cc/pd/si/casi/ca6000/tech/hafc6_wp.htm
> >
> > Jeff
> >
> > ""cisco_fun"" wrote in message
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >
> > > I am facing a weird problem with the redundant MSFC card.
> > >
> > >
> > > We have three subnets all configured in a single vlan.192.168.1.0,
> > > 192.168.2.0 and 192.168.3.0
> > >
> > >
> > > The MSFC is running OSPF and the 192.168.0.0 network is being
> advertised.
> > >
> > >
> > > If both the MSFC's are enabled ( i.e. module 15 and module 16 are
> enabled)
> > > one subnet (192.168.2.0) uses MSFC1 as the primary module whereas the
> > other
> > > two subnets (192.168.1.0 and 192.168.3.0) use the MSFC2 as the primary
> > subnet.
> > >
> > >
> > > If I telnet from the 192.168.3.0 subnet to the MSFC IP then the "sh ip
> > > route" command displays only the directly connected routes. If I
telnet
> to
> > > the MSFC IP from the other subnets I can view all the OSPF learnt
> subnets
> > as
> > > well as the directly connected subnets.
> > >
> > >
> > > If I make any changes in the MSFC1 configuration, the same does not
get
> > > replicated in the MSFC2 configuration and viceversa. The IOS version
on
> > the
> > > MSFC is 12.0(3) XE2 and the CatOS version on the sup1A is 5.3(2) CSX
> > >
> > >
> > > The output of the sh fm features command:
> > >
> > >
> > > MSFC15#sh fm features
> > > Designated MSFC: 1 Non-designated MSFC:2
> > >
> > >
> > > Redundancy Status: designated
> > >
> > >
> > > Any help will be greatly appreciated.
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks and Regards ...
> > >
> > > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from Indiatimes at
> > http://email.indiatimes.com
> > > Buy Music, Video, CD-ROM and Audio-Books from
> http://www.planetmonline.com
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13643&t=12360
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
