On a 2900XL series catalyst only one vlan interface will be up. The others
will be in administratively shutdown state!

Gerwin
----- Original Message -----
From: Sundar 
To: 
Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2001 4:00 PM
Subject: Re: VLAN interface remains SHUTDOWN ! ! ! ! ! ! ! [7:15742]


> I am not sure if you can you assign more than 1 IP address to a switch for
> management purposes. This is a layer 2 device and you are using an IP
> address to manage the whole device not the VLANs.
>
> Try removing the IP address from one of the VLANs and see if it works.
>
> Cheers,
> Sundar
>
> "Hamid"  wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Hi group,
> >
> > I have a CATALYST 2900XL switch. All the settings sre set to defualt
> except
> > the hostname, IP address,....
> > I have configured some ports to be on VLAN 2. But the problem is that
VLAN
> 2
> > remains shutdown In the configuration:
> >
> > show  int vlan 2
> > VLAN2 is administratively down, line protocol is down
> >   Hardware is CPU Interface, address is 0004.9a99.9d80 (bia
> 0004.9a99.9d80)
> >   Internet address is 192.168.1.254/24
> >   MTU 1500 bytes, BW 10000 Kbit, DLY 1000 usec,
> >      reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
> >   Encapsulation ARPA
> >   ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00
> >
> > !
> >
> > interface FastEthernet0/9
> >  switchport multi vlan 1,2
> >  switchport mode multi
> > !
> > interface FastEthernet0/10
> >  switchport access vlan 2
> > !
> > interface VLAN1
> >  ip address 192.168.0.254 255.255.255.0
> >  no ip directed-broadcast
> >  no ip route-cache
> > !
> > interface VLAN2
> >  ip address 192.168.1.254 255.255.255.0
> >  no ip directed-broadcast
> >  no ip route-cache
> >  shutdown
> >
> > Can anyone tell me what the problem is?
> >
> > Thanx in advance
> >
> > Hamid




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=15873&t=15742
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to