Thanks Tony!! Seems like I have to upgrade the IOS...
Thomas
""Tony Medeiros"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Redundent routers and NAT really don't mix. Remember NAT keeps a state
> table. If a translated packet leaves on router and comes back on another,
> it will be dropped because there is no state on that router. The PFC's
> don't keep NAT information as part of the XTAG entries.
>
> Workaround...... Use the Native IOS so each MSFC act as one. No load
> balancing but excellent failover.
>
> Tony M.
> #6172
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Thomas"
> To:
> Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 1:06 PM
> Subject: Re: HSRP [7:14135]
>
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I got kinda the same problem, but it is on the real 6509 w/ 2 sup and 2
> > MSFCs. Based on your message below, it seems to resolve the confusion
> > between priority in groups. However, beside NAT, I also have EIGRP
> running.
> > EIGRP does load balancing on both cards, is there a workaround for this?
> >
> > Also, let say I have Vlan 10 as the outside NAT interfaces on both
MSFCs,
> so
> > now with the load balancing of EIGRP, the NATed package still don't know
> > with VLAN 10 it should go to (VLAN 10 on the first card or the second
> > card?). Is it possible that I can have the same VLAN 10 on both cards,
> but
> > they are on different group?
> >
> > Thanks All in advance! I really need your help here, since whoever
setup
> > the 6509 in our production didn't have it redundancy. We tried to
> configure
> > this 6509 to do its primary job, redundancy while not breaking anything
> else
> > (NAT for instant).
> >
> > Thomas N.
> >
> >
> > ""Kevin Wigle"" wrote in message
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > Correct, but if you use secondary ip addresses and a different group
> > number
> > > you can.
> > >
> > > If the original poster wanted 2 HSRP groups where one group was active
> on
> > > RouterA on netA and the other was active on RouterB on netB - both
> groups
> > > would co-exist and not bother each other.
> > >
> > > If RouterA failed then RouterB would become active on netB as well as
> > > already active on netA.
> > >
> > > The opposite holds true of course.
> > >
> > > This is also helpful in trying to load balance HSRP by splitting the
> user
> > > community manually, half to RouterA and half to RouterB - and maintain
> > fault
> > > tolerance.
> > >
> > > Kevin Wigle
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Erick B."
> > > To:
> > > Sent: Monday, 30 July, 2001 06:51
> > > Subject: Re: HSRP [7:14135]
> > >
> > >
> > > > I don't quite understand what your asking, but...
> > > >
> > > > IOS will not let you configure the same HSRP/standby
> > > > address or IP subnet on multiple LAN interfaces. You
> > > > would have to use a different IP subnet on each
> > > > Ethernet interface with a HSRP/standby address in that
> > > > subnet.
> > > >
> > > > Were you asking that or ?
> > > >
> > > > --- BASSOLE Rock wrote:
> > > > > Hello group,
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I want to know if there are problems on doing a
> > > > > double HSRP (ethernet1 and
> > > > > ethernet0) with 2 routers (same configuration).
> > > > > Have you ever incounter any
> > > > > problems (Duplicate addresse, NAT, ...).
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you.
> > > > >
> > > > > Rock BASSOLE
> > > > > Til: +33 (0) 1 45 96 22 03
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > __________________________________________________
> > > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > > Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo!
> Messenger
> > > > http://phonecard.yahoo.com/
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=16024&t=14135
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
