We use valid addresses as loopback in OSPF, so we assigned an entire class C
to loopbackaddresses on routers.
it works fine.
-----Original Message-----
From: Edmondson, Dorothy M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: quarta-feira, 22 de agosto de 2001 10:03
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Loopback0 with Mask of 255.255.255.255 ?? [7:16796]
Is there a preferred addressing scheme for loopback address when
implementing OSPF?
Recently, I read in "Cisco Routers for IP Routing, Little Black Book" using
10.0.0.2/32? What is your experience using 32 bit mask?
Thank you.
Dorothy
Dorothy Edmondson, CCNP +Voice Access, CCNA, CCDA, CCSI
WCS , FIS Quality Practices
*Mail: NCR Corporation
1529 Brown St. EMD-4
Dayton, OH 45479
> * E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Office: Voice: 937 445-4133 VP 622-4133
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=16798&t=16796
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
