Assigning recognizable addresses with /32 masks would be considered best
practises in my opinion. Ideally, these are publicly routable in the SP
space.
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 8/22/2001 at 9:02 AM Edmondson, Dorothy M wrote:
>Is there a preferred addressing scheme for loopback address when
>implementing OSPF?
>Recently, I read in "Cisco Routers for IP Routing, Little Black Book" using
>10.0.0.2/32? What is your experience using 32 bit mask?
>
>Thank you.
>Dorothy
>
>
>Dorothy Edmondson, CCNP +Voice Access, CCNA, CCDA, CCSI
>WCS , FIS Quality Practices
>
>*Mail: NCR Corporation
> 1529 Brown St. EMD-4
> Dayton, OH 45479
>> * E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>*Office: Voice: 937 445-4133 VP 622-4133
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=16805&t=16796
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]