On Sat, 25 Aug 2001, Kervin Pierre wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I'm looking into a T1 setup and I'm a bit confused with the cisco
> options for equipment.  I am looking for equipment for both ends of the T1.
>
> What would be the cheapest setup? I'm looking at the 1600's right now.

cheapest? probably 2 1005's with cheap externel CSU's.

> Are there major draw backs to using those?  I'll have a linux

no, its a decent router for a T1.

> firewall/router on my network so I'm not very worried about doing ACL's
> or any other CPU intensive stuff on the router.
>
> Would I still need the WIC-1T if I go with the 1602?  This router seems
> to have a built in CSU/DSU, would it do?  Are there any scenarios where
> I don't have to get a separate card?

1602 has built in 56k CSU, not T1.  1601 has built int serial.  None of
the 1600's have built in CSU's although all can take the WIC-1DSU-T1
wic card.

>
> Lastly, do I need the same equipment on both ends of the connection?
> I'm trying to see if it will be more cost effect if I provide my own
> equipment on the ISP side.

no you do not need to use the same equipment on each side.

>
> Finally, since I'm providing both ends of the connection, I don't
> *really* have to go T1, do I?  Can anyone suggest a cheaper Layer 1
> solution, compatible with a leased-line.

well, I mean,  you can do whatever you want, you could order a phone line
and some sportster modems if you wanted I suppose.

brian


>
> Any information, insight would be greatly appreciated.
>
> -Kervin
    I'm buying / selling used CISCO gear!!
            email me for a quote

Brian Feeny, CCIE #8036   Netjam, LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]         http://www.netjam.net
VISA/MC/AMEX/COD          phone: 318-212-0245
30 day warranty           fax:   318-212-0246




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=17262&t=17252
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to