> ya know, I am a fan of if it ain't broke, don't fix it, but dude....Do you
Me too. and if I never have to mess with the routers because they're doing
their job, then why upgrade or futz with them, especially a core router? I
love to tinker just like everyone else, but the great thing about a
production network is that if everything IS running, then I can let it be
and work on some of the other stuff that's important (like my lab studies
;-) If I don't need no new features, then I don't upgrade until I do.
I once had a boss who had to have THE LATEST version of code on our network
and would make us schedule IOS upgrades regularly, even when we complained
that there was no value-add to the upgrade. I guess that's the OTHER
extreme...and then we'd have a relatively short amount of time to configure
the 'new features' of the code into our network (I really learned to hate
frame-relay traffic shaping).
> never want the fixes and features of newer code? Just curious...
Especialy
> with Cisco NAT in it's infant stages...
>
> -Patrick
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=20013&t=19933
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
