Food for thought for all of us... -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Leigh Anne Chisholm Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 4:44 PM To: Christian Nielsen; David Coder Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Checking visitors entering your facility I can't say that when I arranged telco services, that I was ever in a position to note the vehicle that the tech(s) came in. I don't know that I'd be too concerned about the vehicles missing but Sean does raise a good point. During this "hot" period of terrorist activity, are you watching all the strangers that come into your organization? I know I've had people walk into one of my remote offices saying that it was time for the printers to get their periodic cleaning--and the staff just let them in. They had complete unescorted access to the facilities. It's just not something that's commonly thought of on a day to day basis, but should be now. -- Leigh Anne > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Christian Nielsen > Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 4:05 PM > To: David Coder > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Checking visitors entering your facility > > And how hard would it be to paint a truck that looks like a carrier truck > and make fakeIDs. > > > On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Sean Donelan wrote: > > Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 17:16:24 -0400 (EDT) > From: Sean Donelan > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Checking visitors entering your facility > > > A major carrier has missplaced several of its service > vehicles. There is some concern they may have been > stolen. So you may want to double-check vendor ID's > of service personnel accessing your facilities. > > > > > Christian > --------- > > i am me, i dont write/speak for them Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=20622&t=20622 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
