There must be a problem with me, because I didn't find anything on the CIT
exam to be poorly worded or difficult to understand.  Then again, I used to
work at a law firm so perhaps my background gives me an unfair advantage.
(-:

Previously I've expressed my opinion about the state of the CCNP exams.
That opinion holds true for CIT as well.  And that in itself is likely the
real reason why I didn't find any of the questions difficult to
understand...


  -- Leigh Anne (just Remote Access left...)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> mike
> Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2001 2:50 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: CCNP now, Thank You! [7:21495]
>
>
> I can't agree with you more about the questions being worded
> badly.  I also
> just finished the CIT exam  for my CCNP.  Every CCNP test I went
> into I felt
> very confident and found myself during the test wondering where
> the hell did
> they come up with some of these questions.  You have to be a laywer to
> interpret some of them.  Although I did well on all of the tests
> an am glad
> that I got the CCNP cert, I really don't feel like my knowledge of
> networking was put to the test.  I hope the CCIE is more
> realistic.  Anyway,
> congrats and good luck!
>
> Mike
> "Ole Drews Jensen"  wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Here's a thanks to all of you who directly and indirectly helped me pass
> my
> > CCNP exams. I passed CIT this morning as the last one.
> >
> > The CIT exam was the one I felt best prepared for, but passed
> with a lower
> > score that any of the others. I felt that the questions were worded very
> > badly compared to the other exams, and I was asked questions about
> specific
> > details that I did not recall having read in any of my books. Anyway, I
> > passed - so I'm happy!
> >
> > A little advise to those of you who are on the first step on the CCNP
> > ladder:
> >
> > 1) Read at least two books for each exam, unless you feel very sure you
> know
> > everything you need to. A good rule that I have used, is to get a study
> > guide with good reviews. You can search, find and check for those on
> > http://www.amazon.com. A study guide usually uses an easier
> language that
> > you can better understand if you're reading about the topic for
> the first
> > time. As a second book, I like to buy a CiscoPress course or exam book,
> > because they are more detail specific regarding what they want
> you to know
> > for the exam. I do not recommend CiscoPress course or exam books as the
> only
> > book unless you are good at reading and understanding technical
> > explanations. They can be a little hard to understand if you're
> not really
> > sure what they're trying to tell you.
> >
> > 2) Download the Cisco exams from Boson. Take all three test exams, and
> then
> > buy the full version of the one you score lowest in.
> >
> > 3) Look on the Internet for other good helping tools or
> descriptions. For
> > the CIT, I recommend using the Flash Cards that Priscilla has available
> > (http://www.priscilla.com), and for the BCMSN exam, I recommend my own
> > applications to help you train the commands on the Catalyst 5000 and
> > calculate Multicast layer 2 and 3 addresses. Those two
> applications can be
> > found by following my RouterChief link below.
> >
> > Now on to CSS1 starting Monday or Tuesday when I expect the book to
> arrive.
> >
> > Have a nice weekend,
> >
> > Ole
> >
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >  Ole Drews Jensen
> >  Systems Network Manager
> >  CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I
> >  RWR Enterprises, Inc.
> >  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >  http://www.RouterChief.com
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >  NEED A JOB ???
> >  http://www.oledrews.com/job
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=21518&t=21495
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to