Can you send the config? I have been spending allot of time doing traffic shaping and may be able to lend some insight if I see the config.
-Eric -----Original Message----- From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 10:07 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Traffic Shaping [7:21991] I've had odd results implementing FRTS, as well. I've been told by a Cisco engineer that it helps to reload the router after applying or changing FRTS commands. I don't know if it's necessary but he said it makes things work a little better. I haven't noticed a difference but perhaps it's worth a try. John >>> "Thomas N." 10/3/01 10:11:15 PM >>> Hi All, I implemeted the Traffic Shaping using map-class and assigned to subinterfaces. The PVCs sharing that physical interfaces however increase in reply time and eventually timeout. What did I do wrong? When I tried General Traffic Shaping, it worked with "traffic-shape rate" and "traffic-shape adaptive" commands. The reason I would like to implement Traffic Shaping with map-class because I would like to apply "Frame-Relay fragmentation" into some PVC to reduce delay time... Any idea why Traffic Shaping with map-class timeouts my PVCs? Thanks All! Thomas N. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=22064&t=21991 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
