what were your recommendations to alleviate the problem? what was the router
model that was being overloaded? would route caching have been of value?

Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 6:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Network utilization levels... [7:21884]


One thing to keep in mind..

A percentage can lie about network performance. If you take a network with a
low percentage of "traffic" based on byte count but a high number of small
packets ( Citrix), you can easily have an overloaded router/switch but
without the gross load on the wire you might expect. The overload comes from
trying to process all the dinky packets which need to be checked, read,
forwarded, folded etc.

this really does happen as I just did an analysis on a Citrix server farm of
over 30 servers hooked to a rather overloaded router. Fun traces showed up
on that.

MikeS




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=22171&t=21884
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to