Richard NO, the traffic generated by the router is not in mind. I am taliking about a couple of hosts located in a VLAN.
""Richard Newman"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hamid, > Are you sourcing your traffic from the router? By default any traffic > sourced from the router will not be policy routed. You need to add a IP > LOCAL POLICY ROUTE-MAP routemap. > > Hope this helps. > > -Richard Newman > > > > ""Hamid"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Hi , > > > > I want to make a policy routing on one of Interfaces, and I have defined a > > route-map for it:( IP addresses are changed) > > > > ! > > route-map TEST permit 2 > > match ip address 133 > > set interface tunnel 0 > > ! > > access-list 133 permit ip 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255 any > > access-list 134 deny ip 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255 any > > access-list 134 prmit ip any any > > ! > > interface fastethernet0/0.7 > > ip address 192.168.100.1 255.255.255.0 > > ip policy route-map TEST > > encapsulation isl 7 > > ! > > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 serial 4/0 > > ------------------------------------------ > > The problem is that policy routing dosn't work at all. The packets are not > > routed to the tunnel interface at all, instead they are routed through the > > default route (serial 4/0). First I thought the problem is with the > > access-list, so I applied the 134 access-list for outbound traffic on my > > sreial interfaces, THE PACKETS MATCHED THE ACCESS-LIST AND GOT DROPPED. > > > > I don't what causes the problem, is it an IOS bug or I am doing something > > wrong. > > > > Any input would be appreciated, > > > > Thanks > > Hamid Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26212&t=26196 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
