How easy it is to forget that our native tongue is foreign to others. Try this page: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/556/12.html#0
Let's call E0 the external interface and E1 the internal. ip nat inside source list 1 interface ethernet 0 overload ! int e0 ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 ip nat outside ! int e1 ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0 (or whatever) ip nat inside ! access-list 1 permit 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255 This should work just fine for those inside wishing to initiate communication outside. Those outside cannot initiate communication to inside machines as there is no static mapping of addresses with this config. > -----Original Message----- > From: Provost, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 10:27 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Nat confusion [7:26484] > > > I am trying to setup NAT translation. here is the setup. I > want to NAT any > local address, to the IP address of my external ethernet interface > (many-to-one). 10.0.0.0 is the internal network. > 192.168.1.1 is the IP > address of the external ethernet port. > > I am on the cisco page and I am confused. I have done NAT on > 3Com routers, > but never on Cisco. > > Any config help would be appreciated. > > Thanks, > > Rob Provost Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26501&t=26484 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
