The original question, sorry can't remember who by, was whether this configuration could be used for a VLAN which had Primary and Secondary IP addresses. The IP helper address only specifies the DHCP server.
I'm fairly sure this could not work effectively, although DHCP clients would be issued with addresses. My thought was that the IP addresses issued would always be in the subnet of the primary address. Anybody confirm or deny?? Cheers, Gaz ""Lange, Eric"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > The ip helper-address command is your buddy. The router can convert a UDP > broadcast packet into a unicast and route the packet to the appropriate > network that the DHCP server resides on. > > -Eric > > -----Original Message----- > From: Logan, Harold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 11:41 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: multiple DHCP scopes in a vlan with primary an [7:27264] > > > For those of you that have implemented VLANs with DHCP, do you use one > DHCP server per VLAN, or is there a way to bind a specific DHCP scope to > each VLAN? > > Thanks, > Hal > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Syed Raza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 11:59 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: multiple DHCP scopes in a vlan with primary an [7:27264] > > > > > > It is not recommended to have multiple subnet in one VLAN. > > Basically you are > > killing the whole concept of isolating the broadcast domain. > > But you can not > > argue that it does'nt work. Your DHCP server can assign any > > ip from its > > scopes. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27357&t=27264 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
