>From what I can understand, FRF.11 is just a standard to packetize voice and encap it in a frame-relay header. FRF.12 is a way to break up large packets in a queue, encap them in frame relay headers and interleave small voice packets among the larger packets. FRF.11 has nothing to do with interleaving and fragmenting, and I don't think FRF.11 gets fragmented (although after a certain level of IOS, there was a way to specify the encap size, but this is not fragmentation in my book). I haven't done any VoFR in a while and it was on a 3810.
""Michael Williams"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Can you tell me some of the difference between FRF11 and FRF12 as far as > fragmentation goes? Does 12 offer some improvements (in theory) over 11? I > remember MPPP and FRF11/12 being discussed as ways to fragment packets so > that voice didn't get trounced on a low bandwidth ( > Just curious. > > Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28866&t=28840 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
