/
In reference to Anil and regardless of the level of education 
he claims, his behavior towards some of the group members was 
unconscionable.  

He certainly did not learn that type of behavior in Japan.
\

---- Original message ----
>Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 15:25:28 -0500
>From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Nemeth)" 
  
>Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? 
[7:28378]  
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>On May 3,  4:27am, "anil" wrote:
>}
>} -Anil (PhD [Comp-Sci Tokyo Inst of Technology]- Sister 
School of MIT)
>} Does that count??
>
>     Since this thread seems to have concluded, I won't 
belabour the
>point.  However, comp-sci is a huge field with many 
specialities and in
>many cases, subspecialities.  You say that you have a PhD in 
comp-sci,
>but you didn't tell us what the topic of your thesis was or 
anything
>else about your background.  For all we know, you could have 
studied
>something human interface design or something else that has 
nothing to
>do with networking.  So, saying that you have a PhD in comp-
sci really
>doesn't tell us anything.
>
>     As another example, somebody on one of the other 
mailing lists I'm
>on tried to claim that you can do full-duplex with a hub.  
When people
>corrected him, he said that he was an Electronics Engineer 
and that he
>should know.  Electronics Engineering is a very large field, 
so unless
>he specifically studied physical networking hardware, he 
wouldn't
>know.  Anybody that knows anything about networking knows 
that a hub is
>a dumb multiport repeater (i.e. not much more then a signal 
amplifier)
>and therefore can't support full-duplex connections (for 
that, you need
>some smarts).  Needless to say, he got thoroughly trounced 
for his
>haughty attitude.
>
>}-- End of excerpt from "anil"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28975&t=28378
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to