FWIW I have never used the "subnets" keyword when redistributing static, now OSPF, for sure!!
Dave Lee wrote: > > (REPOST) > > I have a question regarding the "subnets" keyword for redistribution: > > I have recently been presented with a scenario by a CCIE - the question > goes: to redistribute the two static routes into a EIGRP router (one is > 10.1.1.0 /24 & other is 10.2.2.0 /24) - and the router only runs EIGRP > process. The thing that confused me is the subnets keyword: The CCIE > suggested that I need to use the "subnets" keyword under the EIGRP process > to redistribute the static routes (since they are subnetted): > > e.g. router eigrp 100 > redistribute static subnets > > But I also read on TCP / IP Vol 1 (by Doyle) that states that subents > keyword should only be used when redistributing "discontingous" subnets into > "OSPF" - I haven't got the book in front of me on the moment, I can dig up > the exact page number tonight... > > So who is correct? And if the book is wrong, howabouts do I redistribute the > subnetted routes into other protocols (like EIGRP, IGRP, BGP etc) > > Thanks in advance, > > Lee -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=29071&t=29046 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
