Hi..  My HQ asked me to "put a loop on the serial link", the serial link is
currently connected from a router to a NTU with a V35 cable, may I know how
to do it without getting a loop back connector?

   


-----Original Message-----
From: Joachim Bdr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AW: SDSL [7:29464]


Hi,

no the cisco 800 series supports g.shdsl but not sdsl. 
Sdsl has an outher line coding and it isn't a standard like g.shdsl.

Best regards
J. Baer
 -----Urspr|ngliche Nachricht-----
Von:    [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Gesendet:       Dienstag, 18. Dezember 2001 13:51
An:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff:        SDSL [7:29464]

Hi!

My company is considering using DSL for communication.
My knowledge in this area is somewhat minimal :)

I have found the cisco 633 that supports sdsl.

But I really need something that can do both sdsl, hdsl, vdsl and adsl.
Cisco 800-series seems to support adsl at least, my question
is if the 800 also can do sdsl? 

Best regards, Johan Ericsson
==================================================================
De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en 
is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht 
onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en 
de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. 
==================================================================
The information contained in this message may be confidential 
and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you 
receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents 
herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail.


==================================================================




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=29470&t=29470
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to